From TechnoEcon
Jump to: navigation, search
  1. Searcy, E. et al. The relative cost of biomass energy transport. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 137-140, 639-652(2007).
  2. Torget, R. et al. Dilute-Acid Pretreatment of Corn Residues and Short-Rotation Woody Crops. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 28-29, 75-86(1991).
  3. Lu, X.B. et al. Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Corn Stover after Pretreatment with Dilute Sulfuric Acid. Chemical Engineering & Technology 30, 938-944(2007).
  4. Aden, A. Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover. (National Renewable Energy Laboratory: 2002)
  5. Roche, C.M. et al. Particle concentration and yield stress of biomass slurries during enzymatic hydrolysis at high-solids loadings. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 104, 290-300(2009).
  6. Blanch, H.W. & Clark, D.S. Biochemical engineering. (CRC Press: 1997).
  7. Ghose, T.K. & Tyagi, R.D. Rapid ethanol fermentation of cellulose hydrolysate. II. Product and substrate inhibition and optimization of fermentor design. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 21, 1401-1420 (1979).
  8. Helle, S., Cameron, D., Lam, J., White, B. & Duff, S. Effect of inhibitory compounds found in biomass hydrolysates on growth and xylose fermentation by a genetically engineered strain of S. cerevisiae. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 33, 786-792 (2003).
  9. Maiorella, B., Blanch, H.W. & Wilke, C.R. By-product inhibition effects on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 25, 103-121 (1983).
  10. Moon, N.J. Inhibition of the growth of acid tolerant yeasts by acetate, lactate and propionate and their synergistic mixtures. Journal of Applied Microbiology 55, 453-460 (1983).
  11. Kuyper, M. et al. Metabolic engineering of a xylose-isomerase-expressing strain for rapid anaerobic xylose fermentation. FEMS Yeast Research 5, 399-409 (2005).
  12. Jeffries, T.W. & Jin, Y. Metabolic engineering for improved fermentation of pentoses by yeasts. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 63, 495-509 (2004).
  13. Wooley, R. et al. Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis Current and Futuristic Scenarios. (1999).at <>
  14. McAloon, Taylor, Yee, Ibsen, K. & Wooley, R. Determining the cost of producing ethanol from corn starch and lignocellulosic feedstocks. (2000).
  15. McCabe, W.L., Smith, J.C. & Harriott, P. Unit operations of chemical engineering. (McGraw-Hill Professional: 2005).
  16. Sinnott, R.K., Coulson, J.M. & Richardson, J.F. Chemical Engineering Design. (Butterworth-Heinemann: 2005).
  17. Seader, J.D. & Henley, E.J. Separation process principles. (John Wiley & Sons Inc: 2006).
  18. Bothast, R.J. & Schlicher, M.A. Biotechnological processes for conversion of corn into ethanol. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 67, 19-25 (2005).
  19. Starfelt, F., Thorin, E., Dotzauer, E. & Yan, J. Performance evaluation of adding ethanol production into an existing combined heat and power plant. Bioresource Technology 101, 613-618 (2010).
  20. Dutta A, Dowe N, Ibsen KN, Schell DJ, Aden A. An economic comparison of different fermentation configurations to convert corn stover to ethanol using Z. mobilis and Saccharomyces. Biotechnol Progress. 2009
  21. Piccolo C, Bezzo F. A techno-economic comparison between two technologies for bioethanol production from lignocellulose. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2009 Mar;33(3):478-491.
  22. Perrin R, Vogel K, Schmer M, Mitchell R. Farm-Scale Production Cost of Switchgrass for Biomass. BioEnergy Research. 2008 Mar 1;1(1):91-97.
  23. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts [Internet]. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering; 2009 [cited 2009 Dec 11]. Available from:
  24. Klein-Marcuschamer D, Oleskowicz-Popiel P, Simmons BA, Blanch HW. 2011. The challenge of enzyme cost in the production of lignocellulosic biofuels. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. DOI: 10.1002/bit.24370.
  25. Emme B. et al. Critical Factors in the Selection of the Process Layout for Hydrolysis and Fermentation of Lignocellulosic Materials. 32nd Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals

Need for Review/Research

The model that we present is intended to be of immediate applicability. However, the choice of parameters can significantly change the results of the simulations. In those cases where changes in parameters affect the output most notably, we have indicated that the user should review the input to get familiar with the choices. Experiments or studies should be conducted, when possible, to refine these values. We have also identified areas where innovation and new technologies can most improve the performance and economics of the process.

Personal tools